This
appendix explains the mathematical foundations for the "individual
shock model of liquidity management.” All that's required to understand
this a basic familiarity with probability and calculus.
The
integral in the equation is an expected value calculation. We can understand it
by first thinking of an expected value calculation without calculus.
Assume a
function, f(x), of a random variable, x, equals 0 or 1 with 50% probability
each. If I asked you to calculate the expected value of f(x), you’d probably be
able to figure out intuitively that the answer is: 0*.5 + 1*.5 = .5. We simply
multiple each possible value of f(x) by its respective probability of
occurring. We can represent this in mathematical terms as E[f(x)] = ∑fipi,
where E[] represents the expected value of whatever we’re interested in, fi
represents each possible value of f(x), and pi
represents the probability of a given value of f(x), and ∑ represents the summation
of each fipi pair.
In the
example above, the random variable is discrete, as there were a finite number
of values f(x) could take on. Thus the ∑fipi calculation
works. However, if we’re thinking about an infinite number of values, the
random variable is continuous, and we need to use calculus. The expected value
calculation analog for a continuous random variable is
E[f(x)]
= ∫f(x)*Φ(x)dx, integrated from negative infinity
to positive infinity
Φ(x) is the probability density function of the continuous random variable x. You can see this is very
similar to the discrete calculation. We’ve pretty much just substituted an
integral for the ∑ sign, and a probability density function for pi.
To
address the equation in the post specifically, let’s match up the notation of
the individual shock model to the general example E[f(x)] = ∫f(x)*Φ(x)dx.
C(q) corresponds to E[f(x)]. Our f(x) is the following step function:
f(x) = iB*(q+x) , if x < -q
f(x) = 0 , if x > -q
So now we just need to explain the limits on the integral. Before I said that the expected value integral integrates from negative to positive infinity. Why is it from negative infinity to –q in this equation? The answer is that you don’t have to integrate to positive infinity, because once the random liquidity shock x > -q, then C(q) = 0 by definition. In other words, at all values of x where x > -q, the liquidity shock is not negative enough to drive the bank’s reserves below zero, in which case the bank will face 0 borrowing costs. C(q) will thus be 0, and taking the integral of 0 across any range of values is 0. Thus, it would be unnecessary to continuing integrating, but you could if you wanted.
And that’s it!
No comments:
Post a Comment